HELL IS THE GRAVE
Eternal Torture a Fiendish Invention of the Fleshly Mind
"The dead know not anything . . . There is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest" (Eccl 9:5-10).
(It may be thought that we are contending with a doctrine no longer believed and taught, but eternal
torture of the damned is still Christendomís official creed, and a necessary corollary of the immortal soul
Of all the false doctrines of orthodox Christendom, or any other system of religious speculation, surely it can be safely said that the hideous conception of eternal excruciating agony for nine-tenths of the human race in the flames of hell has been the most destructive of faith in God and belief in the Bible -- the most productive of atheism and skepticism.
There is no greater blasphemy or perversion of Scripture than to attribute such characteristics to God.
True indeed, He reveals Himself as a God of justice and vengeance upon the wicked and disobedient, and
His firm declared purpose is to bring every evil work into remembrance and to pour just retribution upon
But He is never portrayed in Scripture as a merciless fiend who delights in the wanton and purposeless
eternal torture of His Own creatures.
We are told, on the contrary, that in the great coming day of judgment, the wicked shall, according to their
deserts, receive few or many stripes with shame and contempt, and that the end of them all is eternal
destruction -- a complete blotting out -- a consuming into smoke and ashes.
The conception of eternal intense torture for the vast majority of mankind, with the few redeemed forever
feasting their eyes on the scene with pitiless satisfaction, is so hideous and monstrous that it is difficult to think any rational mind has ever believed it.
Perhaps when some sensational preacher luridly portrays such characters as Hitler and his inhuman
accomplices in eternal torments, people in the heat of emotion find it possible to conceive of such things
and find satisfaction in them.
But just carry it to its logical conclusion. We are asked to believe by the exponents of hellfire traditions that of the people we work with, our neighbours, those we see and meet from day to day -- of these the vast majority will, after a few brief years in which sorrow predominates, go to a hopeless destiny of eternal torment by vicious fiends of evil.
This is the view of the providence of God that we are shut up to if we accept these traditions of immortal-
soulism and eternal torment.
We would not, upon reflection, wish this fate upon the worst character we could conceive of, yet upon the
flimsy basis of a few scraps of misunderstood Scripture, the orthodox churches have, it seems almost
eagerly, built up this fiendish and inhuman doctrine, and have wilfully or ignorantly ignored all the plain
teachings of the Bible about the dead sleeping, being at rest, knowing nothing, having no thoughts,
activities or emotions; and about the wicked being destroyed, consumed into smoke and ashes, being cut
off, perishing in their own corruption and like their own dung.
Eternal torment is taught in theory, but denied in fact, for actually, no one is ever actually believed to go there. Some redeeming feature or deathbed repentance or extreme unction takes them to heaven.
This is one of the systemís greatest evils. It is so horrible they are afraid to face it, and they consequently make a mockery of all the principles of equity and justice, and obliterate all distinctions of good and evil, right and wrong, by a thick layer of sentiment.
The Bible teaches plainly that the wicked will be destroyed -- and they WILL, to trouble creation no more. This is just, reasonable, scriptural.
THE original and root meaning of the English word "hell" is a "covered, hidden, concealed, or secret
place." As a verb, to hell or to hele is given in Webster to mean "to cover, conceal, or keep secret," and it is still used in this sense in some parts of England, as to hele a house with a roof, or to hele seeds by covering them.
USE IN COMMON VERSION
But this word, like many others, has unfortunately acquired a false ecclesiastical color and meaning.
THE word "hell" occurs in our common version 54 times, 31 in the Old Testament and 23 in the New. It is
a translation of 4 different words in the original, one (Sheol) in the Old, and three (Hades, Gehenna, Tartaros) in the New.
The last, Tartaros, occurs but once (2 Pet. 2:4).
Gehenna appears 12 times, it is always translated "hell," and it is always connected with burning and corruption.
Sheol and Hades, the other two, are synonymous terms, as will be demonstrated, and altogether occur 76 times. 41 times they are translated hell, 32 times grave, and 3 times pit.
While Sheol, Hades and Tartaros refer to the same place or state, Gehenna is entirely different in meaning.
SHEOL is a term for the place of the dead in general, and for this reason "hell" in its original and uncorrupted meaning is a better word for sheol than "grave" is.
THE STATE OF THE DEAD
"Grave" primarily means the specific place of a particular corpse or corpses. The Hebrew for this is geber, as --
"My grave (geber) which I digged for me" (Gen. 50:5).
On the other hand, sheol in the Hebrew and "hell" in its primary meaning are general terms as (Psa. 6:5) --
"The king wept at the grave (geber) of Abner" (2 Sam. 3:32).
"In the grave (sheol) who shall give Thee thanks?"
However, while "grave" used as a general term will well fit all passages where sheol occurs, "hell" in the popular sense would be absurd in some places and would immediately reveal the popular error. For example, where Jacob says (Gen. 37:35) --
"Hell (sheol) and destruction are never full" (Prov. 27:20).
"I will go down into sheol unto my son mourning."
And where Job says (14:13) --
"O that Thou wouldest hide me in sheol."
It is not to be supposed that either Jacob or Job anticipated or hoped to go to eternal torment.
In all the 65 places where sheol is found, there is not one that gives any countenance to the idea of a place of burning torment of the damned. It is always in the sense of the general hidden state of the dead -- all the dead -- good and bad alike.
And not only is sheol used as the resting place of all the dead indiscriminately, but we have specific
mention of righteousness and approved men going there and expecting to go there.
We have seen this of Jacob and Job. Also David (Psa. 88:3), Hezekiah (Isa. 38:10), Christ (Psa. 16:10;
Acts 2:31; 3:15), and all the faithful (compare Hos. 13:14 with 1 Cor. 15:54-56).
Sheol is a place of silence --
"Let the wicked be ashamed, and let them be silent in sheol" (Psa. 31:17).
There is no remembrance there (Psa. 6:5) --
"The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence" (Psa. 115:17).
"In death there is no remembrance of Thee, in sheol who shall give Thee thanks?"
Sheol is "in the dust" and there we "rest together" "in darkness" (Job 17:13-16). Beauty is consumed there (Psa. 49:14). There is no work or knowledge there --
"There is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in sheol whither thou goest" (Ecc. 9:10).
It is dark there, and is called the "land of forgetfulness," and "destruction" --
"Wilt Thou show wonders to the dead? Shall the dead arise and praise Thee?"
The "mighty" are spoken of as lying there with "their swords under their heads" (Eze. 32:27). This is a
clear reference to the ancient custom of burying warriors in their graves with their weapons of war, but quite at variance with the traditional hell of torment.
"Shall Thy loving kindness be declared in sheol? Or Thy faithfulness in destruction?"
"Shall Thy wonders be known in the dark? And Thy righteousness in the land of forgetfulness?" (Psa.
And what we are told elsewhere concerning the state of the dead fully harmonizes with what we have
learned about sheol. Death is always associated with oblivion, corruption, dissolution, returning to the dust, passing away as a shadow, the end of thought, knowledge, activity or memory.
DEATH, NOT TORTURE, IS THE PUNISHMENT OF SIN
Consider what Job says of the state of the dead and see how IMPOSSIBLE it is to harmonize with it the
tradition of reward or punishment at death --
"But man dieth and wasteth away: yea, man giveth up the ghost (gava -- expires), and where is he?
As the waters fail from the sea, and the flood decayeth and drieth up: so man lieth down and riseth not: till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their SLEEP" (Job 14:10-15).
Where is heavenly bliss or torment? He continues --
"O that Thou wouldest hide me in sheol, that Thou wouldest keep me secret, until Thy wrath be passed, that Thou wouldest appoint me a set time and remember me!"
In his affliction, he looked forward to the unconscious, peaceful rest in sheol until the day of resurrection and judgment. He had no illusions about sheol or hell being a place of fiery torment. He knew that there the wicked cease from troubling and the weary are at rest, they lie still and are quiet together, for he says (Job
"Why died I not from the womb? why did I not expire (gava) when I came out of the belly? Why did the
knees prevent me? or why the breasts that I should suck?
Such is the great silent congregation of the dead, all together in one sleeping host: kings, counsellors,
princes, still-born infants, the wicked, the weary, the prisoners, the small, the great, the servant and master. And of them all the preacher says (Eccl. 9:5) --
"For now should I have lain still and been quiet, I should have slept: then had I been at rest, with kings and counsellors of the earth, which built desolate places for themselves: or with princes that had gold, who filled their houses with silver:
"Or as an hidden untimely birth I had not been: as infants which never saw light.
"There the wicked cease from troubling and there the weary be at rest. There the prisoners rest together;
they hear not the voice of the oppressor. The small and great are there; and the servant is free from his
"The living know that they shall die, but THE DEAD KNOW NOT ANYTHING."
"In death there is no remembrance of Thee (Psa. 6:5).
"The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence" (Psa. 115:17).
As to any part of man continuing in consciousness after death, the Scriptures rule out any such theory.
All the terms that are used in Hebrew to define the element of life or spirit or breath in man are similarly employed with respect to animals --
Nephesh -- "soul, life, body, or person" ;
Chayiah -- life abstractly considered" ;
Nephesh chayiah --
"living soul or creatures" ;
Ruach -- "breath or spirit" ; and
Neshamah -- "breath."
All these terms are applied to animals just as to man. And of both the preacher says (Eccl. 3:19) --
"For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts . . . as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath (ruach)."
And what is "death" in the one case is "death" in the other -- the opposite of life, the absence of all life, and of all the things that make up life -- vitality, action, knowledge, sensation, emotion, consciousness.
Death is darkness, silence, forgetfulness, corruption, dissolution, smoke, ashes, dust, oblivion --
"All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again."
All through the Scriptures the picture is the same --
"Man goeth to his long home, the mourners go about the streets . . . then shall the dust return to the
earth as it was: and the spirit (ruach -- breath) shall return unto God Who gave it" (Eccl. 12:5-7).
We know the common, simple meaning of death. We use the word without any difficulty, and we use it of
animals just the same as of humans.
"His breath (same word -- ruach) goeth forth, he returneth to his earth: in that very day his thoughts perish" (Psa. 146:4).
"Thou takest away their breath (ruach) they (the animals -- see context) die, and return to their dust" (Psa. 104:29).
Again Paul, when comforting the Thessalonians concerning those who had died, does not say that they are in heaven in bliss and full consciousness as all the clergy tell us, and that the living will go soon to join them there.
He never mentions anything like this, strangely enough, but he says, on the very CONTRARY (1 Thess.
4:13-18), that the dead in Christ are ASLEEP, and that at the coming of Christ they will arise from that
condition to join the living in his presence.
And many times we find Jesus, Paul, and others in Scripture, speaking of the dead as being asleep, and not only just asleep, but "asleep in the dust of the earth" (Dan. 12:2). How can this possibly be if they are wide awake in heaven or even wider awake in hell?
Such is death, and the Scriptures declare repeatedly that it is death that is the great penalty for sin. Right from the beginning, death is the sentence, and the wording of that sentence as originally given shows
clearly what is meant. God said to Adam as a consequence of his disobedience (Gen. 2:17) --
THE WICKED DESTROYED, NOT TORTURED
There was no threatened eternal torment, but on the contrary Adam was told (Gen. 3:19) -
"In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou RETURN UNTO THE GROUND: for out of it
wast thou taken: for DUST THOU ART AND UNTO DUST SHALT THOU RETURN."
Paul says, commenting upon the Adamic sentence (Rom. 6:23) --
"The wages of sin is death."
And Rom. 6:21 --
"By one manís offence death reigned" (Rom 5:17).
"The end of those things (the works of the flesh) is death."
-- not eternal living torment, but DEATH.
"Sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth DEATH" (James 1:15).
The penalty of death and destruction is both just and merciful, the penalty of eternal torture is neither just nor merciful.
Death, we have seen, is oblivion and destruction, and death is the wages of sin. The term "DESTROY" is
often used of the fate of the wicked. After the "few or many stripes" of chastisement, the end of all is
THE PUNISHMENT OF THE WICKED IS FUTURE
The popular conception leaves no room for few or many stripes, for it sweepingly gives all the full
maximum penalty possible, eternal agony in hell, millions and millions and millions and millions of years for the sins of so brief a lifetime, and this for the overwhelming majority of mankind, for Jesus says (Matt. 7:13) --
"Broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and MANY there be which go in thereat.
But here again we note that in the Bible it is not eternal torment that is threatened but destruction, which is something very different.
"And narrow is the way that leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it."
In Matt. 25:46, Jesus says the wicked "go into everlasting punishment," and what this everlasting
punishment consists of is explained by Paul (2 Thess. 1:7-9) where he says that when Jesus shall be
revealed from heaven, the wicked shall be "punished with everlasting destruction." Again (Heb. 10:27) --
"Judgment and fiery indignation shall devour the adversary."
Jesus says (Matt. 10:28) that God is able to --
"DESTROY both soul and body in Gehenna."
And Paul told the Philippians (3:19) regarding the fleshly-minded --
"Their end is destruction."
Peter uses as strong a word as possible when he says (2 Pet. 2:12) --
"These, as natural brute beasts . . . shall utterly perish in their own corruption."
David declares (Psa. 37:20) --
"The wicked shall perish, and the enemies of the Lord shall be as the fat of lambs: they shall consume;
into smoke shall they consume away."
And Malachi 4:1 --
"For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch."
Psalm 145:20 --
"The Lord preserveth all them that love Him, but all the wicked will He destroy."
It will have been noted from many of the foregoing quotations that the judgment and punishment of the
wicked is connected with a special day IN THE FUTURE, when Christ will return from heaven.
This is important, for it clearly demonstrates the error of the conception of immediate reward or
punishment at death. In Matt. 16:27, Jesus says --
"For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father, with his angels, THEN shall he reward every
man according to his works."
He says in John 5:27-29 --
"The Father hath given him (Jesus) authority to execute judgment . . . for the hour is coming in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of condemnation."
Paul declares (2 Tim. 4:1) --
"He SHALL judge the quick and the dead AT HIS APPEARING and his kingdom."
And again (1 Cor. 4:5) --
"Judge nothing before the time, UNTIL THE LORD COME, who both will bring to light the hidden things
of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and THEN shall every man have praise of
And Peter (2 Pet. 3:7) speaks of a FUTURE --
"Day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men."
The word here translated "perdition" is many times translated "destruction." The future aspect of this judgment, the fact that it is always connected with the day appointed when Jesus will return from heaven to judge and destroy, should be well noted throughout. Paul says (Acts 17:31) --
"God hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he
Malachi says of the same day, and of the destiny of the wicked (4:1-3) --
"For, behold, the day COMETH, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do
wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.
Not eternal torture at death, but complete burning destruction in the day of judgment is the consistent
The wicked . . . shall be ashes under the soles of the feet of the righteous IN THE DAY that I shall do this,
saith the Lord."
One of the biggest inconsistencies of the popular belief is that fact that resurrection and judgment
at the last day must be either flatly denied, or else it comes after centuries of bliss in heaven or
torture in hell.
Where is the necessity or reason for either resurrection or judgment at the return of Christ if the dead go to their reward at death? It would not only be unnecessary -- it would be plain absurdity!
BUT the Scriptures say there will be a resurrection, and that it is necessary. We find the day of judgment always associated with resurrection of the dead, and we find resurrection from the grave held out as the only hope of life after death.
Paul devoted 1st Cor. 15 to refuting the contention that there will be no resurrection. He says (vs. 16-18) --
"If the dead rise not . . . then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished."
And in v. 32, after describing the perils he encounters, he says --
"What advantageth it me, if the dead rise not?"
His argument is meaningless if men go to heaven at death for their reward. But Paulís whole hope of reward was centered in resurrection of the last day, as he says in Phil. 3:8-11 --
"I count all things but loss . . . I have suffered the loss of all things . . . if by any means I might attain unto the RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD."
Jesus said (John 6:39) that all those whom the Father had given him he would --
"Raise up at the last day."
And in Luke 14:14, he declares that the righteous --
"Shall be recompensed AT THE RESURRECTION OF THE JUST."
And nowhere do we find either reward or punishment promised before then.
Hades in Greek, as sheol in Hebrew, is the general term for the place of the dead. The Greek had another word for "grave" used specifically. This was mnemeion, as in --
"Jesus therefore cometh to the grave -- mnemeion" (John 11:38).
Hades appears 11 times in the New Testament, and is always translated "hell" except 1 Cor. 15:55, where it is "grave." This is a quotation from Hos. 13:14, where the original is sheol. Acts 2:29-31, where hades is used, is also a quotation from the Old Testament (Psa. 16:10) where the original is sheol.
"The graves -- mnemeion -- were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose" (Matt.
So it is definitely established that the Holy Spirit uses the word hades as an equivalent for sheol. And the Septuagint (Greek translation of Old Testament) uses the word hades throughout for sheol. So whatever sheol means, so we are to understand hades.
Hades in Greek, has just the same primary meaning as sheol in Hebrew and "hell" in English. It is derived, according to the lexicons, from eidon, "to see," with the prefix a, meaning "not," therefore it means "not seen," or "unseen."
All 11 passages where hades occurs are consistent with the meaning of sheol -- the universal hidden resting place of all the dead, and none give any possible suggestion of, or support to, the orthodox ideas of hell, except one, Luke 16:23, the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus, which will be examined later.
This is the only instance, of all the 76 occurrences of sheol and hades, that gives any hint of consciousness or torment, and it will be apparent when we examine it that Christ is speaking in parables, and is using a popular superstition to confound its own supporters.
In Rev. 20:13-14, we learn that hades ("hell" in our version) is to be "cast into the lake of fire." To the orthodox conception, this presents and absurd paradox. To them, hades IS hell, and the lake of fire is hell, therefore hell is going to be cast into hell, and that will be the end of hell -- how then can hell be eternal? And what is the hell that hell is cast into in order to destroy hell?
But in the true Scriptural picture there is harmony and reason. Hades is the grave and the lake of fire is a symbol of everlasting destruction. As the final glorious conclusion, death and the grave, the signs and inseparable accompaniments of this mortal dispensation, are to be abolished, destroyed, consumed. Paul says similarly (1 Cor. 15:26) --
"The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death."
When the wicked have all finally been consumed into smoke and ashes, and all of this dying, mortal race
have either been immortalized or destroyed, then there will be no more death, no more grave.
Death and hades (the grave) will have followed all other traces of mortality and evil into eternal oblivion. THIS is hades (the grave) being cast into the lake of fire -- completely consumed and obliterated.
Paul says later in the same chapter (1 Cor. 15:54) --
"So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory."
Jesus said to Peter (Matt. 16:18) --
"Upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
And when he appeared to John in Patmos he said --
"I have the keys of hades and of death" (Rev. 1:18).
Christís church is never, according to the popular conception, in hell, and consequently there would be no point in his having the keys of hell in order to open its gates for them.
But death and the grave DO claim them, but they do not eternally prevail over them. At his return, he will use these keys, and all whom he calls from the graves will come forth (John 5:28) just as he called Lazarus from the grave and he came forth. To this Paul refers when he says (1 Cor. 15:55-57) --
"O Death, where is thy sting? O Grave, where is thy victory? . . .
To have the keys of death and the grave is to have the power to open its gates and release those held therein.
"Thanks be to God who giveth us the victory through Jesus Christ our Lord!"
Gehenna appears 12 times, and is always rendered "hell." It has nothing to do with sheol or hades and to translate it by the same word as is done in the Common Version is unfaithful and inexcusable.
Gehenna is a proper name, and should be so used. There is no warrant for translating it "hell," just theological bias. It is the name of a place. It appears 13 times in the Old Testament and is always there treated as a proper name of an actual site -- the Valley of Hinnom.
And in the New Testament, although truly it is used with a symbolic as well as a literal meaning, still it is on the literal meaning that the symbolic is based, and this cannot be understood if it is falsely translated.
For Jesusí allusions to it to be understood, the facts of the name and place must be known. And one fact
we shall find throughout -- it was a place of destruction and corruption, and not of preservation in torment.
Utter consuming destruction is always the fundamental idea behind this word.
The Greek Gehenna is a transliteration of the Hebrew Gai Hinnom, meaning "Valley of Hinnom." This valley of Hinnom was the refuse dump of the city of Jerusalem. It can be seen on any map of Jerusalem, curving around the southwestern corner of the city. The Septuagint translators of the Old Testament into Greek use the word Gehenna where "Valley of Hinnom" appears in our version.
Originally, in this valley, there was a place called Topheth, and the history of the valley, as we are
interested in it, begins with this place. The word Topheth is generally understood to mean "place of
burning," and that is what it was. It was a place where, in the Canaanitish worship, human victims were
burnt on an altar or sacrificed on the altar and the bodies then burned. Of King Ahaz it is recorded (2
Chron. 28:3) --
"Moreover he burnt incense in the Valley of the son of Hinnom, and burnt his children in the fire, after the
abominations of the heathen whom the Lord had cast out before the children of Israel."
The same is recorded of King Manasseh (2 Chron. 33:6).
As a result of these practices by the apostate kings of Judah, we find in 2 Kings 23:10 that Josiah, the
"Defiled Topheth, which is in the Valley of the children of Hinnom (Gai Hinnom -- Gehenna), that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech."
This defilement by Josiah was the beginning of its use as the repository of the filth of Jerusalem. Here, right up to New Testament times, fires were kept perpetually burning for the consumption of the refuse of the city. The bodies of criminals were often cast into this place, as a final indignity and degradation.
Topheth is mentioned many times in Jeremiah 19. The prophet is sent there to prophesy against Jerusalem,
and Topheth, the place of refuse and burning, is used as a symbol of destruction and defilement and
Isaiah uses the same symbol in foretelling the destruction of Assyria. He says (Isa. 30:33):
"Tophet is ordained of old; for the king it is prepared; he hath made it deep and large: the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of the Lord, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle it."
The use here is both literal and figurative, for while it was actually in this valley that the host of Sennacherib was destroyed, the prophecy obviously refers to the greater complete destruction of the later day Assyrian power -- the combined forces of Russia and Papal Europe.
In the New Testament the same is true. The literal Gehenna, just outside of Jerusalem, will figure largely as a site of the destructive fiery judgments to which the term is figuratively applied.
Thus the terms Tophet, Hinnom, or Gehenna were used to indicate devouring judgments and the destruction of anything that was cast out as useless and offensive and utterly consumed by corruption and fire.
Christ accordingly used the term of the destiny of the wicked, whom we have seen will be consumed to smoke and ashes by Godís fierce anger.
As in the literal all which was rejected, undesirable, and unclean was cast into Gehenna outside the city, so
into the consuming lake of fire outside the spiritual new Jerusalem will be cast all who are found unfit for
access into the city.
Not one of the 12 references to Gehenna give any hint of sustained torment, but always, in keeping
with other references to Tophet and Hinnom, to burning consumption and destruction. There is not the slightest support for the popular doctrine in any of the uses of Gehenna.
Unquenched or unquenchable fire means neither everlasting fire nor everlasting torment. Unquenchable
fire, as scripturally used, means fire that completely consumes it object and fulfills its purpose of destruction.
Sodom and Gomorrah "suffered the vengeance of eternal fire" (Jude 7). It is not still burning.
God warned Israel (Jer. 17:27) that He would --
"Kindle a fire in the gates thereof, and it shall devour the palaces of Jerusalem, and shall not be quenched."
The fire was kindled, Jersualem was burned, but the fire is not still burning. It was not quenched -- it was not halted in its purpose.
Isaiah in the last verse of his prophecy, although he does not mention Topheth or Gehenna, clearly refers to
the same final judgment to which they are applied. He says --
"And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against Me:
He does not, it is significant to note, speak of living persons in torment, but of carcases being consumed by worm and fire.
"For their worm shall not die; neither shall their fire be quenched: and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh."
The third word in the New Testament translated "hell" in the Common Version is Tartaros. This occurs
only once, 2 Pet. 2:4 --
TWO PLACES APPEAR TO TEACH TORMENT
"God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down into tartaros, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment."
To the Greeks, tartaros appears to have signified a subterranean prison of dense darkness, or the outer void confines of the earth. And Peter here uses it as synonymous with hades. The chains of darkness and the reservation to future judgment are harmonious with this.
The verse is no support for the popular idea, but very much the reverse, for it describes hell as a place of
darkness and confinement WAITING FOR judgment -- a perfect description of sheol or hades scripturally understood, but nothing like the orthodox hell.
For this hideous and blasphemous doctrine, there are only two places in all the Bible which could be considered to give it the slightest shadow of support, and both of these upon examination demonstrate the
utter baselessness of the belief.
THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS
It is almost unbelievable that on the basis of such meager and twisted evidence, orthodox priestcraft should build such a repulsive and repugnant doctrine, in the face of the whole teaching and tenor of Scripture.
One would consider that men would be extremely reluctant to believe such things even on strong evidence, instead of eagerly snatching at isolated straws to support them in the very face of such strong evidence. Unfortunately, the men who translated the Scriptures into our tongue were steeped in this error and have colored their translation with it, as we have seen.
No honest and careful study of all the appearances of the words Sheol, Hades, and Gehenna, and of the teachings of Scripture on the nature of man and the destiny of the wicked, could possibly produce the lurid nightmare that is the orthodox conception of eternal torments amid the fiery demons of hell.
First, we ask, is this parable to be taken literally and all the other plain teaching of Scripture rejected upon the strength of it? We must face this issue squarely and choose. The Scriptures say the dead are asleep in the dust of the earth, they know nothing, they will come forth to resurrection and judgment at the last day. We have seen that this is the consistent teaching of the Bible throughout.
REV. 20:10 and 14:9-11
Now we must either flatly reject ALL this testimony, or we must regard this story for what it truly and
obviously is, a parable worded according to the false doctrines of the very class Jesus was addressing -- the Pharisees.
As is apparent from the contemporary Jewish historian Josephus, this account of Abrahamís bosom, the great gulf, the tormenting flame, was part of the pharisaical tradition by which they made void the Word of God (Mark 7:13), and Jesus was merely confounding them with their own errors and "answering a fool
according to his folly" (Prov. 26:5) and "taking the wise in their own craftiness" (1 Cor. 3:19).
Compare his treatment of a similar Pharisaic parable (Matt. 12:27) and how he picked it up and turned it
against his adversaries --
"If I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? Therefore they shall be your
We are clearly told that Jesus deliberately spoke to them in parables that they should not understand (Matt. 13:10-13; Luke 8:10). This parable is in the middle of an obvious chain of other parables, and opens with the same introduction.
Taken literally, it is not in harmony with the orthodox conception of hell that it is claimed to prove. So-called immortal souls according to popular belief, do not possess fingers and eyes and tongues, neither is there visibility and conversation between heaven and hell. Taken literally, it is an absurdity from any point of view.
The other place used to support the theory of eternal torment is Rev. 20:10 --
"And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the
false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."
Similarly in Rev. 14:9 11 --
"If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of His indignation.
Here then is the whole case for eternal torment -- a parable, and a case of obvious symbolism.
"And he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence
of the Lamb.
"And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who
worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name."
We submit that any attempt to take the admittedly symbolic book of Revelation literally to teach doctrines that are at complete variance with the whole tenor of plain Scripture is extremely unsound and unjustified interpretation.
It would not be suggested that the wine of the wrath of God, and the cup of His indignation, and the beast,
and the mark on the forehead, and the great city Babylon, all mentioned in these very same verses, are to be taken literally. All these things must be understood in harmony with the first principles of Scripture.
In Rev. 20:14 we have death and hell cast into this same lake of fire. Can death be literally cast anywhere? Is hell cast into hell? To childishly take isolated parts of this symbolism to bolster unscriptural notions is not the course of honesty or wisdom.
The plain scriptural teaching on the state of the dead and the destiny of the wicked is too clear and
repeated to give any excuse for false doctrines to be built on such passages as these.
And it could be mentioned in passing that the expression here translated "for ever and everí does not in the Greek carry the same unlimited sense as the English, and must be understood in relation to the matter involved.
On the basis of all the foregoing, we conclude without doubt that HELL, as scripturally understood, is the grave, the silent, dark, unseen resting-place of ALL the sleeping dead, the land of oblivion and
forgetfulness -- and not the eternal, flaming torture-chamber of orthodox superstition. (GVG).